|
A questionaire was conducted to obtain ran satisfactions in information of the 325 disabled persons among the total 9,314 handicapped people in Taejon area, and was surveyed during the period of June 1 to August 31, 1997. The results are as follows: 1. Among the studied disabled persons, 54.5% of male, and 45.5% of female. 2. Before disabled in occupation, 32.0% of out of work group were high, 6.5% of farm, student group were low. Before disabled in occupation by gender, male group is 29.9% of out of work group were high, 0.6% of housework group were low. female group is34.5% of out of work group were high, 4.7% of student group were low(P<0.001). 3. After disabled in occupation, 75.1% of out of work group wert high, 10.8% of in working group were low. After disabled in occupation by gender, male group is 87.6% of out of work group were high, 1.7% of housework group were low. female group is 60.1% of out of work group were hgh, 10.8% of in working group were low(P<0.001). 4. Medical security status, 64.9% of medical aid group wore high, 35.1% of medical insurance group were low. Medical security status by gender, male group is 71.2% of medical aid group were high, 28.8% of medical insurance group were Iew. female group is 57.4% of medical aid group wan high, 42.6% of medical insurance were low(P<0.01). 5. Disabled record status, 68.6% of record group were high, 31.4% of non group were low. Disabled record status by gender, male group is 78.5% of record group were high, 21.5% of non record group were low. female group is 56.6% of record group were high, 43.4% of non record group were low(P<0.001). 6. Disabled duration status, 42.2% of loss than 9 year group were high, 10.2%;of;20-29,;30-39 year group were low. Disabled duration status by gender,’’male group is 44.6% of less than 9 year group were high, 6.2% of 20-29 year group wert low. female group is 39.2% of less than 9 year were high, 39.2% of 30-39 year group were low (P<0.05). 7. Cause of disabled status, 26.5% of other group, 23.7% of congenital group were high. 9.2% of unknown group, 6.8% of industry accident, 2.5% of drug poisoning group were low. Cause of disabled status by gender, male group is 27.7% of other group, 23.7% of congenital group were high, 2.3% drug poisoning group were low. female group is 25.0% of other group, 20.9% of congenital group were high, 2.5% of drug poisoning group were low (P<0.001). 8. Disabled type status, 19.4% of double disabled group were high, 2.2% of muscle paralysis group were low. Disabled type status by gender, male group is 22.0% of double disabled group were high, 2.3% of muscle paralysis group were low. female group is 23.3% of rheumatism group were high, 0.7% of amputation group were low(P<0.001). 9. Smoking status, 73.2% of non smoking group were high, 26.8% of smoking group were low. Smoking status by gender, male group is 59.9% of double non smoking group were high, 40.1% of Smoking group were low, female group is 89.2% of non smoking group were high, 10.8% of smoking group were low(P<0.001). 10. Drinking status, 80.0% of non drinking group were high, 20.0% of drinking group were low. Drinking status by gender, male group is 72.3% of non drinking group were high, 27.7% of drinking group were low. female group is 89.2% of non drinking group were high, 10.8% of drinking group were low(P<0.001). 11. Stress level status, 52.9% of high stress group were high, 1.8% of very severe stress group were low. Stress level status by gender, male group is 50.8% of high stress group were high, 2.3% of very severe stress group were low. female group is 55.4%of high stress group were high, 1.4% of very severe stress group were low. 12. Heed status, 28.0% of economic support were high, 4.6% of speech therapy, brace group were low. Need status by Sender, male group is 2i2% of economic support group were high, 4.5% of bracegroup were low. female group is27.7% of economic support group were high, 3.4% of speech therapy group were low. 13. Care satisfaction comparision, 3.09, 0.55 point of IBR, 4.01, 0.45 point of CHR(P<0.001). 14. The variables which had positive correlation with IBR were gender(r=0.1406, P<0.01), age(r=0.1872, p<0.001), economic level(r=0.1246, P<0.05), disabled record(r=0.1137, P<0.05), education level(r=-0.1122. p<0.05). 15. The variables which had positive : correlation with CBR were gender(r=0.1613, P<0.01), age(r=0.2255, P<0.001). list of family(r=0.12i3, P<0.01), disabled record(r=0.1273, P<0.05). education level(r=-0.1294, P<0.01).
|